Application of DVRs in Networks Subject to Reactive Deficiencies
March 2007
Pterra Consulting
DVRs, or dynamic voltage restorers, are a relatively new static
var device that has seen applications in a variety of distribution and
subtransmission applications. DVRs are series compensation
devices that protect electric load against voltage sags, swells,
unbalance and distortion. Though these devices may provide
good solutions for customers subject to poor power quality, we
caution regarding their application in systems that are subject to
prolonged reactive power deficiencies (resulting in low voltage
conditions) and in systems that are susceptible to voltage
collapse.
The reason for the caution is that in many instances the main protection
of networks against voltage collapse is the natural response of load to
decrease demand when voltage drop. The implementation of DVRs
would act to maintain demand even when incipient voltage
conditions are present thus reducing inherent ability to halt a
collapse and increasing the risk of cascading outage and blackout.
About DVRs
The first DVR was installed in North America in 1996, a 12.47 kV system
located in Anderson, South Carolina. Since then, DVRs of
capacities up to 50 MVA have seen applications to critical
loads in food processing, semiconductor and utility supply.
Cost and installation constraints limit these to where there is clear
need for constant voltage supply.
DVRs
are power electronic controllers that use voltage source converters
(VSC). They inject independent phase voltages to the
distribution feeder to regulate voltage seen by the critical load.
In various publications, the voltage injection have been termed, "the
missing volts." A typical DVRs design is shown at right.
The source of the injected volts is the commutation process for reactive
power demand and an energy source for real power demand. The
energy source may vary according to the design and manufacturer
of the DVR; some examples of energy sources applied are DC capacitors,
batteries and drawn from the line.
The capacity of DVRs are determined primarily by the inverter
current capability. Bypass protection would trigger once
the current capability is exceeded.
During normal conditions, the DVR operates in stand-by mode. Since
the device is connected in series, there are conduction losses, which
can be minimized by using Integrated Gate-Commutated Thyristor (IGCT)
technology in the inverters.
Note that there is a similarity in the technical approach to DVRs to
that of providing low voltage ride-through capability in wind
turbine generators. The dynamic response characteristics,
especially for line supplied DVRs are thus similar to LVRT-mitigated
turbines.
Characteristic Response
When a fault occurs on a distribution feeder, the voltage sags in
neighboring feeders as well in the portion of the feeder itself which
remains supplied through a power source. After the fault is
cleared, the voltage recovers in a manner influenced by the number of
induction motors connected to the feeder. In general, the more
motors there are, the slower and more oscillatory is the voltage
recovery. This is true whether the fault is the more common
single phase fault to any of the variations of fault types, including
two-phase, three-phase and open phase faults.
Studies
(by other researchers) have found that DVRs have successfully
provided protection against voltage sags to as low as 0.5 p.u. for
durations of up to 0.1 seconds. However, there is considerable
variation in conditions when response is simulated. For
example, in tests where there is no phase-shift component to the
voltage deviation, the DVR performs well over large dips with prolonged
durations. In tests where significant phase-shift is
present in the study or assumed system, the size and type of the energy
source has a significant impact. DC capacitor sources tend not to
hold voltage well under phase-shifts. Battery sources are a bit
better. Line-connected sources through a rectifier provided
the best phase-shifted voltage deviation response in terms of
maintaining voltage at the load.
From the transmission viewpoint, a DVR would extend the voltage range
when load behaves as constant power load. The combination
of on-load tap-changing distribution transformers, voltage-switched
capacitor banks and direct-connected DVRs lead to more current drawn
from the transmission system during periods of reactive deficiency
and low voltages.
A Loss of Relief
As noted in earlier Techblogs, during periods of extremely high
demand such as during summer heat storms, there is a
natural relief system that tends to arrest a declining voltage in
the distribution system as reactive power deficiency in the transmission
system spreads. Devices such as the DVR tend
to
mask distribution load from the drop in voltage in the supply
side. Hence, instead of a drop in demand as voltage drops, demand
remains at the nominal level. This can hasten the onset
of voltage collapse by removing the mechanism that helps systems reach a
Voltage Ledge.
Direct-connected DVRs bring the added concern that as voltage
drops and induction motors load require a phase-shifted supply, the DVRs
increase demand from the transmission system. This type of
response can accelerate a voltage collapse.
Just a Warning
When implementing DVRs, it is important to take into the account the
nature of the load whose voltage supply is being secured, as well as
the the transmission system which must tolerate the change in
voltage-response of the load. In certain applications, it may be
necessary to provide local fast reactive supply sources in order
to secure the system, with the DVR added, from voltage collapse and
cascading outages. A careful simulation study which
includes the transmission system is highly recommended.
References:
- "Dynamic voltage restorer against balanced and unbalanced
voltage sags: modelling and simulation," Nguyen, P.T.; Saha, T.K.,
IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 6-10 June 2004.
- "Experience with an inverter-based dynamic voltage restorer,"
Woodley, N.H.; Morgan, L.; Sundaram, A. Power Delivery, IEEE
Transactions, Volume 14, Issue 3, Jul 1999.
- "The influence of motor loads on the voltage restoration
capability of the dynamic voltage restorer," Chang, C.S.; Ho, Y.S.,
Power System Technology, Proceedings: PowerCon 2000.
- "Voltage regulation using dynamic voltage restorer for large
frequency variations," Jindal, A.K.; Ghosh, A.; Joshi, A., Power
Engineering Society General Meeting, 12-16 June 2005.
- "Dynamic Voltage Restorer For Voltage Sag Compensation,"
Ramasamy, A.K.; Krishnan Iyer, R.; Ramachandaramuthy, V.K.; Mukerjee,
R.N., Power Electronics and Drives Systems, 2005. International
Conference, 28-01 Nov. 2005.
- "A Novel Technique to Compensate Voltage Sags in Multiline
Distribution System—The Interline Dynamic Voltage Restorer,"
Vilathgamuwa, D.; Wijekoon, H.M.; Choi, S.S., Industrial
Electronics, IEEE Transactions, Volume 53, Issue 5. Oct. 2006,
Pages: 1603 - 1611.
- "Voltage Sag Compensation With Z-Source Inverter Based Dynamic
Voltage Restorer," Vilathgamuwa, D.M.; Gajanayake, C.J.; Loh, P.C.;
Li, Y.W., Industry Applications Conference. 41st IAS Annual Meeting.
Oct. 2006.
© 2007. All rights reserved.
|
 
|
Other Articles on
Voltage Stability:
"The
In-Between Voltage State," by R. Austria, December
2005.
"Living on
the Ledge - Operating Distribution Systems at Low
Voltage," September, 2006.
R. Austria, "The
Voltage Ledge," April 2007
"Application
of DVRs in Networks Subject to Reactive Deficiencies,"
March, 2007.
"Observability
and Controllability in Highly Compensated Systems ,"
September 2007 "Rising
Out of the Trench: Insight from the Voltage Response
Curve," October 2007 |
|
|